
Instruments · Chronometer
Chronometer no. 524 by Thomas Earnshaw
- Maker / attribution
- Thomas Earnshaw (maker)
- Date
- c. 1800
- Historical period
- Precision & Scientific Horology (1750 – 1850)
- Country of origin
- England
- Object type
- Chronometer
- Dimensions
- Overall: 199 x 199 x 174 mm
- Holding institution
- Royal Museums Greenwich
- Accession / object no.
- ZAA0732
- Credit line
- National Maritime Museum, Greenwich, London, Foulkes Collection
- Catalogue title (original)
- 524 (English)
View the source record ↗ (opens another website in a new tab)Suggest a correction
Record summary
Held and catalogued by Royal Museums Greenwich (object number ZAA0732), this is a chronometer by Thomas Earnshaw, made in England, dated c. 1800. The Atlas places it in the Precision & Scientific Horology period (1750 – 1850) of its Instruments collection. Recorded dimensions: Overall: 199 x 199 x 174 mm. The record is illustrated with 6 photographs.
Assembled from the source record's structured fields. Dates and attributions are given as the source states them; where a field is missing the Atlas leaves it blank rather than estimating.
Catalogue description
Catalogue description — Royal Museums Greenwich
Plain, two-tier Earnshaw-style mahogany box with open dovetail construction and sliding lid and ypical Earnshaw-type, one-day full plate fusee movement. This chronometer is referred to in one of the testimonials published by Thomas Earnshaw in his Appeal to the Public [FN: Earnshaw I, p.249]. The letter, which was from Chief Officer John Stevens, of the East India Company ship Elphinstone, reads: I am ashamed of having so long neglected to write to you, concerning your timekeeper No. 524, which I had on the last voyage with me. I have had many under my care, and of different makers, but never had one that could in any way be brought in competition with the one above mentioned: it is to be observed it is the first box-chronometer of yours which I ever had; the rate you gave me of it was losing two seconds daily, which rate was allowed on it for the greatest part of a long voyage; but I found that it did alter its rate a little, and in one passage it had increased to three seconds nine tenths per day, which I believe to be its greatest loss at any time on the voyage; and I have good reason to think it might be depended upon not to alter its rate more than the little difference I have above stated from 2” to 3.9” per day, and if the mean rate had been allowed for the whole voyage, it would have given the longitude true within twenty minutes of a degree at any time; but I do not think it ever differed so much from the truth as I have above supposed, as in a long passage of eighty days it made the land within thirty minutes of a degree, a degree of accuracy the most sanguine makers could scarce expect to be equalled, the most enthusiastic friends to timekeepers could never expect to be exceeded. I must further beg leave to observe, that as I seldom omitted an opportunity of observing lunar distances, I always had an opportunity of judging that there was no material variation at any intermediate time on this passage. If it can be of any service to you to produce the observations upon which the above remarks are founded, I shall be glad to do it, in justice to your merits, and for the benefit of the public at large, who are so deeply interested in the advantages arising from your extraordinary exertions and discoveries. It is not known for how long Stevens kept the chronometer, and its subsequent history is unknown up to the 1960s. The chronometer was bought by the collector Robert Foulkes from the horologist Gerald Grundsell in August 1967
Historical context
Precision & Scientific Horology (1750 – 1850)
Harrison solves longitude; Mudge invents the lever; Breguet's Paris workshop defines the modern watch.
The longitude problem was solved by the marine chronometer and lunar distance methods; dividing engines made precision scales possible, and observatories set time by transit instruments.
Read the period in the timelineMore instruments from this periodEarlier: Early Modern Horology
Atlas type guide
Marine chronometers
A marine chronometer is a precision timekeeper carried at sea to find longitude: the navigator compares local noon, observed with a sextant, with the time at a reference meridian kept by the chronometer. Each hour of difference corresponds to fifteen degrees of longitude. John Harrison proved the method in the 1760s; Pierre Le Roy, Ferdinand Berthoud, John Arnold and Thomas Earnshaw then developed the detent escapement and the compensation balance that made chronometers practical to manufacture.
By the nineteenth century London, Liverpool, Le Locle and Glashütte supplied navies and merchant fleets. A typical box chronometer has a spring-detent escapement, a fusee to equalise mainspring torque, a bimetallic compensation balance with a helical balance spring, and is mounted in gimbals inside a wooden box so that it stays level.
What to look for
- Gimbals and a three-tier wooden box with a glazed inner lid.
- A power-reserve ('up and down') indicator on the dial, usually showing 56 hours on two-day instruments.
- Spring-detent escapement and a cylindrical (helical) balance spring visible through the movement.
- Admiralty or navy marks (broad arrow), and rating certificates from observatories.
- The maker's number on the dial and movement; many makers' registers survive, allowing dating.
Dating clues
- Earnshaw-type spring-detent chronometers became standard after about 1800.
- Auxiliary compensation devices on the balance appear from the mid-nineteenth century.
- Quartz and radio time signals ended routine use of mechanical chronometers in the 1970s and 1980s.
General guidance written by the Atlas editors about this kind of object. It is not a statement about this particular piece; for that, rely on the source record above and on physical examination.
Read next:Spring detent (chronometer) escapementBalance spring (hairspring)Detent escapement
Related records
Instruments · 1763–1829
Chronometer watch by Thomas Earnshaw No.498, with later barrel cover numbered 2829, balance cock and regulator. In 18 ct. gold case hallmarked 1807/8
Science Museum Group, London
Instruments · 1795–1810
Gold-cased Chronometer watch no.728 made by Thomas Earnshaw, 1795–1810
Science Museum Group, London
Instruments · 1795–1805
Marine chronometer by Thomas Earnshaw, England, 1795–1805
Science Museum Group, London
Instruments · 1800–1834
Chronometer watch in silver case by Thos. Earnshaw, London, no.422 (also 2653), 1800–1834
Science Museum Group, London
Instruments · 1731–1776
Azimuth compass sundial by James Ferguson, London, England, 1731–1776. Could also be used as a tablet sundial - string gnomon is missing (see note).
Science Museum Group, London
Instruments · 1738–1777
Azimuth sundial 4 3/8" diam, with folding gnomon fitted in mahogany case, made by B. Martin
Science Museum Group, London
Instruments · 1750–1800
Single sand glass in four pillared wooden mount. 17 minutes. Horne Type B. Second half of the 18th century
Science Museum Group, London
Instruments · 1751–1825
Sundial, by Troughton, in case. Invented and made by Troughton
Science Museum Group, London
