Skip to content
Omega wristwatch, ref. 234.10.39.20.01.001, Seamaster 300 60th Anniversary Trilogy, originally sold in December 2017 (per the lot record) — view 1 of 1
View 1 of 1 · Image: Antiquorum Genève SA · original image source (opens another website in a new tab)

Wristwatches · Wristwatch

Omega wristwatch, ref. 234.10.39.20.01.001, Seamaster 300 60th Anniversary Trilogy, originally sold in December 2017 (per the lot record)

DocumentedDocumented from an auction catalogue; attribution as stated by the auction house.
Maker / attribution
Omega (brand / maker)
Date
originally sold in December 2017 (per the lot record)
Country of origin
Switzerland
Object type
Wristwatch
Materials / technique
stainless steel
Dimensions
diameter 39 mm
Lot
Lot 368-31
Credit line
Auction lot record: LOT 31, Geneva, May 11-12, 2024
Catalogue title (original)
OMEGA, SWITZERLAND, REF. 234.10.39.20.01.001, SEAMASTER 300 60TH ANNIVERSARY TRILOGY, STAINLESS STEEL (English)

View the source record (auction lot) ↗ (opens another website in a new tab)Suggest a correction

Record summary

Catalogued by Antiquorum auction archive, Geneva (lot Lot 368-31), this is a wristwatch by Omega, made in Switzerland, dated originally sold in December 2017 (per the lot record). The Atlas places it in the Contemporary Horology period (2010 – Present) of its Wristwatches collection. Materials and techniques recorded by the source: stainless steel. Recorded dimensions: diameter 39 mm. The record is illustrated with 1 photograph.

Assembled from the source record's structured fields. Dates and attributions are given as the source states them; where a field is missing the Atlas leaves it blank rather than estimating.

Catalogue description

Antiquorum catalogue description

A fine and limited to 3557 pieces, stainless steel, self winding diver's wristwatch with center-seconds

Lot specifications (Antiquorum)

Model: Seamaster 300 60th Anniversary Trilogy; Reference: 234.10.39.20.01.001; Movement No.: 89264433; Bracelet: stainless steel Omega bracelet with deployant clasp, approx. overall length 200 mm.; Caliber: 8806, 35 jewels; Diameter: 39; Signature: dial, case and movement; Accessories: original fitted box, warranty, master chronometer, pictogram cards, limited edition booklet, instruction booklet, bracelet changing tool, extra leather strap with Omega steel buckle, original invoice from Beyer

Inscriptions & marks

dial, case and movement

Provenance

Property of a Swiss Gentleman

Historical context

Contemporary Horology (2010 – Present)

Silicon components, connected watches, optical-lattice research clocks and a thriving independent scene.

Smartwatches became the world's best-selling watches, while mechanical watchmaking focuses on craft, innovation (silicon components, new escapements) and independent makers.

Read the period in the timelineMore wristwatches from this periodEarlier: Mechanical Renaissance

Atlas type guide

Dive and water-resistant watches

Keeping water and dust out of a wristwatch was a long-standing challenge. Rolex's screw-down Oyster case (1926) and Omega's Marine (1932) were landmarks; in the early 1950s Blancpain's Fifty Fathoms and Rolex's Submariner defined the professional dive watch with rotating bezels for timing dives, luminous dials and high water resistance. The ISO 6425 standard (1982) later codified what a 'diver's watch' must do.

Dive watches became icons of post-war design and exploration, and their evolution — helium escape valves, ceramic bezels, saturation-diving depth ratings — records the history of underwater work.

What to look for

  • Unidirectional or bidirectional rotating bezel with minute markings.
  • Screw-down crown and case back; depth rating printed on the dial.
  • Luminous hands and markers (radium before c. 1960, tritium c. 1960–1998, then Super-LumiNova).
  • Reference numbers on the case between the lugs or inside the back.

Dating clues

  • Screw-down Oyster cases: from 1926.
  • Professional dive watches: from 1953.
  • Tritium 'T' marks on dials: c. 1960–1998.

General guidance written by the Atlas editors about this kind of object. It is not a statement about this particular piece; for that, rely on the source record above and on physical examination.

Related records