Skip to content
Technos Skydiver, 1960s — view 1 of 6
View 1 of 6 · Image: S.Song Watches · original image source (opens another website in a new tab)

Wristwatches · Wristwatch

Technos Skydiver, 1960s

DocumentedDocumented from a dealer's listing; attribution and date as stated by the dealer.
Maker / attribution
Technos (maker)
Date
1960s
Country of origin
Unrecorded in source
Object type
Wristwatch
Dimensions
Case 37.5 mm
Stock no.
Product 1375331516503
Credit line
Dealer listing, S.Song Watches (product 1375331516503)
Catalogue title (original)
Technos Skydiver (English)

View the source record (dealer listing) ↗ (opens another website in a new tab)Suggest a correction

Record summary

Catalogued by S.Song Watches (dealer), Seattle (stock number Product 1375331516503), this is a wristwatch by Technos, dated 1960s. The Atlas places it in the Modern Mechanical Horology period (1945 – 1969) of its Wristwatches collection. Recorded dimensions: Case 37.5 mm. The record is illustrated with 6 photographs.

Assembled from the source record's structured fields. Dates and attributions are given as the source states them; where a field is missing the Atlas leaves it blank rather than estimating.

Catalogue description

Dealer description — S.Song Watches

I will be the first to admit, I never knew much about these watches. Occasionally I would see one come up for sale but I never used to take much notice. I knew they were cased in the same 37.5mm stainless steel case as the more famous and cultish Titus Calypsomatic, but that’s about it. After trying one on for myself, I fully regret not taking more notice. These Skydivers are hugely underappreciated and undervalued in my opinion, as they are beautifully robust watches. Featuring a black glossy dial with huge hour markers and thick sectored hands filled with lume, it has a lot going for it. The contrasting red date wheel and the very attractive font style used for the logo and model name really makes this one of the great divers. The stainless steel case, with a black rotating bezel, long thick lugs and that huge crown, sits so well on the wrist and while it is the same case as a Calypsomatic, I much prefer the Technos as I think the dial design is much more attractive. Overall, this is one of my favourite divers and this example is in one of the nicer conditions I've come across.

Historical context

Modern Mechanical Horology (1945 – 1969)

Tool watches for divers, pilots and astronauts; electric watches anticipate the electronic age.

The classic era of the mechanical wristwatch: dive watches, chronographs for motor racing and space flight, GMT watches for jet travel, slim dress watches, automatic calendars, and the rise of Japanese manufacturers alongside Swiss, American, German and Soviet industries.

Read the period in the timelineMore wristwatches from this periodEarlier: Golden Age of Mechanical Watchmaking

Atlas type guide

Dive and water-resistant watches

Keeping water and dust out of a wristwatch was a long-standing challenge. Rolex's screw-down Oyster case (1926) and Omega's Marine (1932) were landmarks; in the early 1950s Blancpain's Fifty Fathoms and Rolex's Submariner defined the professional dive watch with rotating bezels for timing dives, luminous dials and high water resistance. The ISO 6425 standard (1982) later codified what a 'diver's watch' must do.

Dive watches became icons of post-war design and exploration, and their evolution — helium escape valves, ceramic bezels, saturation-diving depth ratings — records the history of underwater work.

What to look for

  • Unidirectional or bidirectional rotating bezel with minute markings.
  • Screw-down crown and case back; depth rating printed on the dial.
  • Luminous hands and markers (radium before c. 1960, tritium c. 1960–1998, then Super-LumiNova).
  • Reference numbers on the case between the lugs or inside the back.

Dating clues

  • Screw-down Oyster cases: from 1926.
  • Professional dive watches: from 1953.
  • Tritium 'T' marks on dials: c. 1960–1998.

General guidance written by the Atlas editors about this kind of object. It is not a statement about this particular piece; for that, rely on the source record above and on physical examination.

Related records