Skip to content
Concord Watch Co. wristwatch, ref. 51.81.115, quartz black dial, circa 1985-1990 — view 1 of 2
View 1 of 2 · Image: Antiquorum Genève SA · original image source (opens another website in a new tab)

Wristwatches · Wristwatch

Concord Watch Co. wristwatch, ref. 51.81.115, quartz black dial, circa 1985-1990

DocumentedDocumented from an auction catalogue; attribution as stated by the auction house.
Maker / attribution
Concord Watch Co. (brand / maker)
Date
c. 1985-1990
Country of origin
Unrecorded in source
Object type
Wristwatch
Materials / technique
18k yellow gold
Dimensions
height 33 mm; width 31.5 mm
Lot
Lot 348-49
Credit line
Auction lot record: LOT 49, Hong Kong, March 9th, 2022
Catalogue title (original)
Concord Watch Co. Ref. 51.81.115, quartz, black dial, integrated bracelet; “Mariner”; 18K yellow gold, onyx and diamonds (English)

View the source record (auction lot) ↗ (opens another website in a new tab)Suggest a correction

Record summary

Catalogued by Antiquorum auction archive, Geneva (lot Lot 348-49), this is a wristwatch by Concord Watch Co., dated c. 1985-1990. The Atlas places it in the Quartz Revolution period (1969 – 1990) of its Wristwatches collection. Materials and techniques recorded by the source: 18k yellow gold. Recorded dimensions: height 33 mm; width 31.5 mm. The record is illustrated with 2 photographs.

Assembled from the source record's structured fields. Dates and attributions are given as the source states them; where a field is missing the Atlas leaves it blank rather than estimating.

Catalogue description

Antiquorum catalogue description

18K yellow gold and diamond-set, quartz, vertical “tonneau”-shaped, gentleman’s wristwatch, snap-on case-back, dodecagonal bezel set with 24 brilliant-cut diamonds and six black onyx plates, black onyx dial set with 12 brilliant-cut diamonds; integrated bracelet set with 92 brilliant-cut diamonds.The watch is set with a total of 128 brilliant-cut diamonds.

Lot specifications (Antiquorum)

Model: “Mariner”; Reference: 51.81.115; Case No.: 938 505; Material: 18K yellow gold, onyx and diamonds; Bracelet: integrated 18K yellow gold CWC bracelet with clasp (Ref. C925 S231); Dimensions: Length 190 mm. (approx.); Height: 33 mm.; Width: 31.5 mm.; Weight: 109.8 gr. (approx.); Signature: dial, case and movement; Accessories: original fitted box, international guarantee (blank; for “Delirium” model)

Inscriptions & marks

dial, case and movement

Historical context

Quartz Revolution (1969 – 1990)

Seiko's Astron begins mass quartz timekeeping; traditional industries contract sharply.

Quartz and digital watches transformed the market after 1969. Swiss employment collapsed, Japanese and Hong Kong production soared, and the Swatch (1983) helped the Swiss industry recover; mechanical watches survived as luxury goods.

Read the period in the timelineMore wristwatches from this periodEarlier: Modern Mechanical Horology

Atlas type guide

Dive and water-resistant watches

Keeping water and dust out of a wristwatch was a long-standing challenge. Rolex's screw-down Oyster case (1926) and Omega's Marine (1932) were landmarks; in the early 1950s Blancpain's Fifty Fathoms and Rolex's Submariner defined the professional dive watch with rotating bezels for timing dives, luminous dials and high water resistance. The ISO 6425 standard (1982) later codified what a 'diver's watch' must do.

Dive watches became icons of post-war design and exploration, and their evolution — helium escape valves, ceramic bezels, saturation-diving depth ratings — records the history of underwater work.

What to look for

  • Unidirectional or bidirectional rotating bezel with minute markings.
  • Screw-down crown and case back; depth rating printed on the dial.
  • Luminous hands and markers (radium before c. 1960, tritium c. 1960–1998, then Super-LumiNova).
  • Reference numbers on the case between the lugs or inside the back.

Dating clues

  • Screw-down Oyster cases: from 1926.
  • Professional dive watches: from 1953.
  • Tritium 'T' marks on dials: c. 1960–1998.

General guidance written by the Atlas editors about this kind of object. It is not a statement about this particular piece; for that, rely on the source record above and on physical examination.

Related records