Skip to content
Tudor Princess Oysterdate ref. 7581, Sunburst Silver 'Rose' Dial — view 1 of 6
View 1 of 6 · Image: Oliver & Clarke · original image source (opens another website in a new tab)

Wristwatches · Wristwatch

Tudor Princess Oysterdate ref. 7581, Sunburst Silver 'Rose' Dial

DocumentedDocumented from a dealer's listing; attribution and date as stated by the dealer.
Maker / attribution
Tudor (maker)
Date
c. 1967
Country of origin
Switzerland
Object type
Wristwatch
Materials / technique
silver
Dimensions
Case 26 mm
Stock no.
OC2946
Credit line
Dealer listing, Oliver & Clarke (OC2946)
Catalogue title (original)
Tudor Princess Oysterdate Ref. 7581 - Sunburst Silver 'Rose' Dial (English)

View the source record (dealer listing) ↗ (opens another website in a new tab)Suggest a correction

Record summary

Catalogued by Oliver & Clarke (dealer), United Kingdom (stock number OC2946), this is a wristwatch by Tudor, made in Switzerland, dated c. 1967. The Atlas places it in the Modern Mechanical Horology period (1945 – 1969) of its Wristwatches collection. Materials and techniques recorded by the source: silver. Recorded dimensions: Case 26 mm. The record is illustrated with 6 photographs.

Assembled from the source record's structured fields. Dates and attributions are given as the source states them; where a field is missing the Atlas leaves it blank rather than estimating.

Catalogue description

Dealer description — Oliver & Clarke

Many Tudor models even resembled and shared the names of their Rolex relatives: i.e. Submariner, Prince, Oyster, etc. The piece that we have here, a Princess Oysterdate, is a ladies example dating to circa 1967. The stainless steel Oyster case comes in at 26mm in diameter and features attractive 'twisted' lugs, with a screw-down crown, a smooth steel bezel, and comes fitted to a matching 'rivet' Oyster bracelet with a blade clasp. Inside, the silver dial retains it's vibrant sunburst finishing and crisp black printing with the always alluring Tudor 'Rose' logo with the 'smiley' text on the lower half. These simple 'Oyster' models are an exercise in restraint. No frills. Purely a functional timekeeping device. And on top of presenting great value next to its cousins over at The Crown, truly represents the essence of the brand. ...and with that 'rose' logo on the dial — dare we say cooler?

Historical context

Modern Mechanical Horology (1945 – 1969)

Tool watches for divers, pilots and astronauts; electric watches anticipate the electronic age.

The classic era of the mechanical wristwatch: dive watches, chronographs for motor racing and space flight, GMT watches for jet travel, slim dress watches, automatic calendars, and the rise of Japanese manufacturers alongside Swiss, American, German and Soviet industries.

Read the period in the timelineMore wristwatches from this periodEarlier: Golden Age of Mechanical Watchmaking

Atlas type guide

Dive and water-resistant watches

Keeping water and dust out of a wristwatch was a long-standing challenge. Rolex's screw-down Oyster case (1926) and Omega's Marine (1932) were landmarks; in the early 1950s Blancpain's Fifty Fathoms and Rolex's Submariner defined the professional dive watch with rotating bezels for timing dives, luminous dials and high water resistance. The ISO 6425 standard (1982) later codified what a 'diver's watch' must do.

Dive watches became icons of post-war design and exploration, and their evolution — helium escape valves, ceramic bezels, saturation-diving depth ratings — records the history of underwater work.

What to look for

  • Unidirectional or bidirectional rotating bezel with minute markings.
  • Screw-down crown and case back; depth rating printed on the dial.
  • Luminous hands and markers (radium before c. 1960, tritium c. 1960–1998, then Super-LumiNova).
  • Reference numbers on the case between the lugs or inside the back.

Dating clues

  • Screw-down Oyster cases: from 1926.
  • Professional dive watches: from 1953.
  • Tritium 'T' marks on dials: c. 1960–1998.

General guidance written by the Atlas editors about this kind of object. It is not a statement about this particular piece; for that, rely on the source record above and on physical examination.

Related records